Monday 27 July 2015

Running is fr... er, no, it's not.

Almost three years ago, on the blog pre-dating this one which chronicled my days of utterly despising running, I wrote a post called “Running is free!”. I did so to illustrate that it isn’t: yes, you can keep costs down, sticking to cheap gear (but don’t skimp too much on the shoes!) and avoiding races (hey – parkrun is not a race, but it’s timed and it’s free!). However, no: you can’t avoid forking out altogether. Running may basically be just going out in public and putting one foot in front of the other, albeit at a slightly accelerated pace: but then going out in public and putting one foot in front of the other is never free. You may not keep track of the cost:mile of the shoes you wear, but I bet in my case it’s higher than the 3p/mi per pair of Brooks Green Silence I generally manage, given I get at least a thousand miles out of each pair. Although, come to think of it, I’ve not bought a new pair of non-running shoes since… well, since I bought my first pair of running shoes. OK, one pair: and those were nice and cheap in the US, a pair of ‘work’ shoes (no, not steel-caps). So the ones I use must have a fair amount of civilian mileage on their soles… and still I didn’t succumb to the discounted temptations of Clarks Village last week!
Ditto with jeans, shirts, flat caps and stuff. Indeed, it was on the civvy side that running cost me a few bob: having started putting one foot in front of another at a slightly accelerated pace to avoid having to buy bigger jeans than the 36s and 38s I was squeezing into, I ended up having to buy 32s. And I could only invoice my Nonna, who’d made a comment about me needing to lose a few pounds (OK, kilos), for so many suits. But hey: that’s an excuse for me to post the photo below again, and one I’ll seize with both hands:

Because you can never have too many before/after shots of middle-aged runners on the Internet.
. . .


So: we’ve dealt with the basics. The kit, the gear and the optional race entries. I tell folk that I actually don’t race that much, “relatively speaking”: and I believe that’s a fair assessment. So far this year, for every mile I’ve raced I’ve run eight in training, and that’s my lowest ratio ever, having been over 20 for the past two years. And that’s not because I’m entering more races, rather because the races I’ve entered have been getting longer…
…just bear that in mind in September and October, which are set to feature two half marathons, three marathons and a 40-mi ultra – i.e. six races when the rest of 2015 is set to feature seven in total! And yes, most of my races come with associated travel and accommodation costs. I don’t track mine, but I could come up with a pretty good estimate quickly enough. I choose not to, and make do with the knowledge that they don’t stop me from paying the mortgage, the bills, the family holidays and the takeaways for Family Movie Nights. And I know that the friendships I’ve built and strengthened along the roads and trails are worth every penny, without even bringing into the equation the small detail of the fitness benefits. Which, sure, you could get from non-competitive training runs, although having a focus helps with those training runs, be it by kicking me out of bed on dark and wet winter mornings or up the backside when I start to relax on warm summer runches. I’ve long maintained you get more than a medal for racing: you get all the motivation and expectation in the build-up. It’s money well spent. Trust me, Sweetie. And just like some folk drinks, watch movies or share meals when spending time with their friends, I just happen to run ‘with’ them – but it’s still socialising with mates! As was the case in a field in Staffordshire over the weekend, where hundreds of runners shared the experience of Thunder Run. What would otherwise be just another 10k trail course is home to epic feats by those running 24-hr solo (top job Martin!), trying to clock as many laps as possible, and to great efforts and fun by those who are part of a team, sharing the laps. It’s trail, it’s England and it’s July, so obviously for most of the weekend it chucked it down… but that didn’t stop my friends there are having fun! Even the injured one… after all, there are bars.

So where do we draw the line? As committed amateur runners, how much should we be spending on gear? How many gadgets do we need? How many stats should we be tracking? How well should we know our own body?

. . .

This offers me a chance to share my views on Richard Askwith’s latest offering, “Running Free”. Askwith’s first book, “Feet In The Clouds”, is rightly revered by anyone who’s read it: an engaging recollection of his pursuit of a successful Bob Graham Round, the ultimate fell running test this island of ours has to offer. So I began reading “Running Free” with expectations of a height comparable to Scafell Pike. Alas, it somewhat disappointed.

The tales of Askwith’s wild and innocent runs are as enchanting as ever. And, when he criticises some of running’s commercial excesses, be they unnecessary kit or organisations sanitising one of man’s most basic activities, I run firmly alongside him. But, when he states that “signing up for a Park Run [sic] without repeated exposure to the sponsors’ messages requires considerably more digital ingenuity” than he possesses, he is doing himself a disservice. Or at least he is not doing justice to his ability to ignore commercial messages, as I assume that he does not succumb to every instance of advertising pointed his way. Least I hope so, given we’re exposed to an average 3,500 marketing messages per day… granted, Londoners are probably exposed to three times that amount, and in rural Northamptonshire where Askwith lives and runs it will be a tiny fraction – but still a meaningful one. Anyway: parkrun
…parkrun has got a lot of people off the couch and into running at least 5k a week. As I’ve said before, it’s probably this country’s strongest weapon against its mammoth obesity problem. It’s free, relying on sponsors (as do commercial media organisations) and an army of volunteers in hi-vis jackets. I’ve run forty-four parkruns, and owe them two very important thanks:

1. Free, timed 5k runs have helped me improve my speed. Counter-intuitive as this may sound, I need speedwork to improve my long-run pace: and parkrun has helped a great deal.
2. A regular, social run is a great way of meeting like-minded people. As well as the running between 09:00 and (hopefully) 09:19, I look forward to my Saturday mornings for the banter in the car with Tim and Simon from 08:10 to around 08:40 and for the chats with the likes of Bob, Ciaran, David, Dom, Emma, Graham, Michael (yes, in alphabetical order!) either side of the run. And, of course, to any flapjack and cakes with which landmark runs (someone’s 50th or 100th, say) are celebrated!
As is the case with other events up and down the country, Little Stoke parkrun truly is a community, one that routinely serves the local area as well as runners from further afield such as me. And I’ve not spent a single pence with its sponsors… not as a result of their support for parkrun, anyway. I bought from Sweatshop before they replaced Adidas, whom I generally avoid because in my mind they still represent Teutonic order and conformism… the power of marketing on an impressionable child’s mind, eh?!

So: I’ve defended parkrun… I won’t jump to Tough Mudder’s defence purely out of personal preference, but have no issue with people choosing to fork out on such events if they so please. I just prefer to run on drier terrains. On the whole, I found Askwith’s praise of running in its most natural, basic form somewhat naïve and unbalanced. For, whilst he outlines his theory about the “Seven Ages of Running” and acknowledges that he went through the first six before reaching the climax of the seventh, he doesn’t appear to state clearly enough that no age is superior to any other, as he sat seemingly smugly on top of the pyramid. He dismisses roadies’ PB-chasing as a failure to enjoy running alone with nature: which is fine for a runner who, by his own admission, is beyond those PB days, having set some pretty darn impressive ones. But hey: let us enjoy the occasional thrill of the race, eh? Just the way I enjoy trail runs, both training ones and races where time really isn’t of the essence. All runners, aren’t we?

Right – I’ve got that off my chest. It had been there for a while. And I’m actually still glad I read it: there are plenty of good bits! Back to… where was I?
Ah yes – how much should we spend on running gear…

. . .

I’ve not bought running clothing for ages, if we exclude the green and black West Highland Way top I bought ahead of the race – and wore for it. Prior to that, ahead of the last winter I spent less than £20 on a pair of decent glow-yellow shirts for my pre-dawn runs: otherwise, old shirts and finishers’ shirts do me just fine. I’m OK for shorts, have just got my parents to buy me a few new pairs of Kalenji socks as the holes were getting more frequent… just as well I had about half a dozen identical pairs, so I can match the survivors!

Watch… the Garmin Forerunner 410 I bought with Christmas 2012 gift money is still my companion of choice. I was tempted by a second-hand Suunto Ambit Sapphire 2 a clubmate was selling: ‘tempted’ as in “I bought it”, but have resold since, passing back to its original owner the difference between “eBay price” and “clubmate price”. It just… wasn’t for me. I may upgrade at some point, but for now the 410 I bought for £143 on Christmas Day 2012 and via which I’ve logged 8,246 miles (£0.017/mile) has served me perfectly well and is safe. I’m a roadie, not an explorer.

Watch accessories… the 410 came with a chest-strap HRM, which I replaced earlier this year with a Mio wristband… cost me £70 and I’ve yet to drive maximum value from it, but I’m getting there… and I bought a cadence sensor a year ago which hasn’t been monitoring since Littl’Un knocked it over and which I’ve not felt the need to replace… In terms of technology, that’s it. No headphones, for sure: that’s a no-go area for me. I run to get away from noise, not to take it with me. But that’s another story…

Nutrition… yep, I buy gels for (some) long runs and for marathons… Shot Bloks, Clif Bars… But do I spend any more than I do on snacks when we come out of the swimming pool? Definitely not. I probably eat on average one Clif Bar/week: it’s not an expense that’s going to throw me into the red… it may seem exorbitant when I take delivery of two dozen at a time, but that’s because it only happens twice a year! Man’s gotta snack: I just happen to snack on stuff that you don’t find in supermarkets! (Although I almost took a photo when I saw Clif Bars in an aisle of one in Boston, Mass.)

Liquids… I just turn on the tap! When running over 50k I may take SIS electrolytes with me, but that again is a rare treat. Both the 50ks and the tablets.

Other stuff… yes, my Salomon SkinLab Hydro 12L was a treat, and doesn’t look like something that should cost just shy of a hundred quid! But it’s been my companion on three official ultras, a social one and as many times over training runs. It was there for me on my landmark run to date. Was it worth investing a pound per mile of the West Highland Way Race to have it on my shoulders, containing my phone, my emergency £10, foil blanket, waterproofs, food and water? You bet.

My Salomon is the nearest thing to an extravagance. These things being subjective, I could sit here and justify all sorts of purchases. But I won’t. I think the amount I spend on running is commensurate to the miles I cover and the pleasure and fitness I get out of it, and don’t regret any of it.

Now then… what about… beyond the gear? The intangible stuff?

I ask this question having only last week undertaken VO2 Max, lactate threshold and skinfolds tests at Bath University. They came in at just under £140. How can I justify spending that much to know how much oxygen I use, at which point my body starts to generate lactate that accumulates in my blood streams and weighs down my legs and how much fat I’m carrying (something my scales already estimate for me)?

Firstly, let’s suggest this costs me a little under £3/week, and that I’ll be able to rely on those test results for a year. Which, based on the nature of my running and what Jonathan Robinson, who ran the tests at the University of Bath’s Sports Village, is reasonable…

Every month, I spend about two days running. That’s right: around 48 hours. During that time, I generally cover around 250 miles. Some months I run further, others faster or maybe steeper. It depends on the goal: few of my training runs for the West Highland Way Race were fast, but some were looong…
Regardless, on average every day I dedicate a little over an hour and a half to running. How would I spend those 96 minutes if I didn’t run? Probably an even split between sleeping and watching TV. So yep, I’m #winning.

There you have the quantity of my training. Because every run, in some shape or form, is a training run, be it a slow, anonymous three-mile recovery run, a longer slog that generally precedes it or the speedwork session that generally follows it over the course of any given week. As Julian Goater repeatedly stated in “The Art of Running Faster”, the only training book you’ll ever need (least I hope, as it’s the only one I’ve ever read!), every run should have a purpose. But training… for what?

That’s a challenge for a runner like me. I’m not exclusive about what I run, covering the entire spectrum from parkruns to ultras. I’m not a specialist speedster, half-marathoner, marathoner or an ultrarunner: I’m a Gia of all trades. And that’s how I like it: each distance presents me with different challenges and rewards me in different ways. But it does make training that little less straightforward than if I were more limited in my goals, with clearer priorities. And priorities change.

For 2015, my priority was the West Highland Way Race. It was all about getting from Milngavie to Fort William. I revised my (loose) time goal downwards and would have hit it but for a navigational error ninety-four miles into the ninety-five mile race: and that’s fine. I’m still delighted with the result and how I felt throughout the day. Would I swap all those smiles and how well my body felt (swollen knee aside) at the end for seven minutes? Nope. Nor would I for fourteen seconds on top of that. I aimed to complete the race and I did…
…my training plan worked. It came down to running a lot, to running up hills, to running at unusual times of day, to running back-to-back marathon and ultramarathon distances. It took some planning, but it was planning I could manage on my own. With a little help from my friends, but without any great deal of blinding science.

2015: ticked. 2016?

. . .

I want to focus on shorter stuff next year. There’ll still be some ultras: three, I suspect. A return to Green Man and High Peak 40, and a maiden voyage to Lizard’s Point to run the coast path to Land’s End for The Classic Quarter. Green Man, in March, is on my doorstep; HP40, in September, makes for a weekend in Sheffield; and Cornwall’s not that far away, with Classic Quarter neatly sandwiched between the other two ultras in June. Plus I’ll get to see Cornwall properly, if only forty-five miles of it. But, as per the final paragraph of an earlier post, I won’t be heading up to Scotland. Anything after this year’s Triple Crown (assuming I complete it on Saturday) would be a step down. Anything other than significantly faster times, that is: and I don’t want to focus on those. Because it would have to be a single-minded focus for which I don’t have the mental energy, or least I don’t want to have to find it. I’d much rather focus…

…on half marathons and marathons. Where the margins between success and failure are so much more clearly defined. And, when you cross that line, you know which side of that divide you’re on.

For the West Highland Way Race, my gold time was sub-24, my silver time (and gold time upon signing up) was 24-26 and my bronze goal was just finishing. My silver time was a two-hour window, pretty much the time between Paul Giblin reaching the Leisure Centre and Neil McNicol claiming second place. Over 26.2 miles, my silver time window would be no greater than ten minutes: a marathon’s 27.5% the length of the WHW, but the window’s only 8% the size. With margins of error so fine, I’ll need all the help I can get. And I accept some of that help will cost me a few quid.

That’s why I was looking forward to the pain of the tests at Bath Uni. Because I expect them to help shape my marathon training, if not define it completely. Because they should help me get a realistic feel as to what my goals should be and over what timeframe I should aim to hit them. I’ve some figures in mind, but they are not worth the brain cells storing them. Hence my desire to rely on professional knowledge and scientific data to establish what times are realistic for me in 2016 over 13.1 and 26.2 miles. And change (well, ‘tweak’) them to what I want them to be if required. Because I’m in Marketing, and that’s my prerogative.

Did the tests disappoint?

. . .

Not at all!

I now know my body fat index is 13.4% - which is good. Yes, I measure that every week with simple scales: but they’re so simple they’re two percentage points out, so at least now I know I can adjust that value downwards or that, at least, a bad value is probably not that bad. Or try and find a set like the ones that broke last year, as they were far more reliable…

I now know that my relative (54.9 ml/kg/min) and absolute VO2 (3.984/min) peak values are “of an excellent level”. I know that because the report I got says so. Apparently 55 ml/kg/min is what an elite tennis male pro should expect. Which is greatly flattering, so I’ll go with that… the average for a 35-45 year-old is 35-38, so I’ll take 54.9, which would be above-average for a man of any age, not least one who’s knock, knock, knocking on forty’s door. As I’ll take a peak blood lactate concentration of 7.0 mmol – that’s good, too. Jonathan says so and I believe him!

Is this knowledge?

Nope. It’s not knowledge. It’s data.

The suggestions I’ve been given to improve my performance represent the knowledge. Equally, I hope my own experiences as I look to tweak my training will inform the subsequent steps, thus creating a virtuous circle. But… one step at a time, eh? One in front of the other…

. . .

So, back to the £140. Sure, instinctively it does stand out as a bit steep. Instinctively you’ll have come up with alternative ways of spending such a sum, and trust me, so did I – and I even added more rational thoughts thereafter! But, in a society where most purchases are moving to a subscription model (trust me, not only am I in Marketing but in IT, too), viewing that as £3/week is not unfair. It just so happens the weekly subscription is paid in advance – but that works with Private Eye…
…£3/wk for tests I do not need?
Hey, I realise £3 means different things to different people. I don’t know your financial situation, you don’t know mine. But if we view three quid as a pint of beer and a packet of crisps…
…yup, that’s affordable. It’s just a shame I never drank more. Because I think I’ve already allocated said theoretical beer savings to funding some of the items I listed earlier. But hey – we can pretend I drank more than I did, right? And I’m genuinely not sure whether I’ll make this an annual item in my calendar or a one-off. To some extent, I’ve left it too late, as the margins for improvement are not what they were a year or two ago. We’ll see: hopefully I can glean sufficient intel from my Mio and my Garmin. But… never say never, eh? Especially in running…

. . .

Running can never be free, but it can be pretty close to it. But, depending on what your goals are, the sense of achievement, of self-improvement and self-worth that hitting them can bring… well, sometimes you need a little help along the way. I went to Bath for some. Some of it came by running for three minutes on a treadmill wearing a face mask before pausing for thirty seconds before starting again at a faster pace until I couldn’t take it anymore some ninety seconds into my 17km/hr session. But some of it came from just being in such an impressive facility and seeing fellow, better sportspeople perform. And that bit…
…yeah, that bit was free.

Of course, this is not just about the running: it never is. None of us know what lies around the corner, but all of us have a duty to take care of this mortal coil that’s been handed over to us. As much as we can, anyway. I seem to be doing an OK job of that. So thanks, running and running friends, for enabling me to do so. Here’s hoping I’ll still be running marathons at 70…

. . .

Allow me to sign off with one final stat: and no, this one is not about me.

Let’s see if I can put the achievements of elite long-distance runners into a perspective that TV images just can’t deliver. In running you don’t see the moment of magic that ball sports produce, and over long-distances it’s harder to appreciate the difference between the good and the great that a sprint may offer. So – get your head round this:

Yesterday I ran three-minute sessions at progressively-increasing speeds (with 30" rest in between) on a treadmill, jumping off (safely) when I couldn't take it any more (or felt I might soon go flying). I maxed out 90” into the 17km/hr session.

In setting the current marathon world record, Dennis Kimetto ran 42.195km in 2:02'57" - an average of 21km/hr. He sustained for over two hours a pace greater than one I could not sustain for ninety seconds.

Let me know when that’s sunk in. Oh, and how long till the first sub-2hr mara? I say September 2017. Berlin, baby.




* in total: five ultras (the West Highland Way trio, Green Man and High Peak 40), four marathons (Manchester, Chester, York and Bristol-Bath), two halves (Chippenham and Bristol) and two 10ks (Clevedon -DNF- and Weston-super-Mare). I know folk who’ve run thirteen races by the end of February.
Oh, and I am really serious about not running WHW in 2016. Family wedding that weekend.

1 comment:

  1. A fantastic read as always :) See you at Green Man next year :)
    (...and possibly the Classic Quarter... but don't tell Emma... SsHh..)

    ReplyDelete