Tuesday, 4 April 2017

My experience with... maranoia!



Pre-Scriptum I: I wrote this post last week. But I knew too many people who were running Greater Manchester Marathon, including two runners for whom it was only their second marathon, to risk freaking them out with my experiences close to race day! So I put this on hold… and they both duly went on to smash their PBs, Mark in 3:08’40” in and Matt in 3:21’47” – as did the more experienced Simon in 3:27’03”. Well done Lads!

Pre-Scriptum II: I was going to publish this yesterday (Monday). But I’ve since had a severe bout of maranoia myself… so severe that a little copy rework has been required!



A year… almost an entire year… that’s how long has passed since I last posted! Haven’t you lot been lucky?!

In my defence, I spent around half that time writing a book, and the latter half not knowing what to write about having just published a book. You did know I have a book out, right? And that you can download it here? For just £2.48 – probably less than your last drink at the bar?

Anyroad…
…I came up with an idea for a new post, so thought I’d give it a go. It is spring, after all. Which means buzzing insects all over the place, chuffin lawns that need chuffin mowing – but also brighter mornings and, of course, Spring Marathon Season. Which means long’uns, spilling over from winter, training plans (for some), dreams of PBs…
…and, as race day approaches, maranoia.

Sometimes referred to as “taper madness”, disappointingly ‘maranoia’ isn’t in the dictionary. But here are a couple of definitions that may help those who’ve never experienced it (i.e. who’ve never run a marathon) understand what I’m going to be waffling on about:

Runner’s World: “mental anxiety found in marathon runners, characterised by the irrational belief that last-minute disaster is imminent.”

Rachael Woolston: “mental anxiety found in marathon runners who become convinced they are injured or ill. Sometimes associated with an unwillingness to leave the house for fear of tripping up, having a car land on their head in the days before a marathon. Some reports of runners wearing vacuum suits on trains to avoid germs.”

And my favourite, by Captivations Teamwear:
“The nervous state during pre-marathon taper that amplifies every sniffle into PB-dream ending pneumonia, and every twinge into a debilitating chronic injury…”

Basically, it’s the fear that hits us when we start tapering, i.e. reducing our mileage after weeks of building leg strength with long runs as the focus shifts to reaching the start, if not the finish, with those legs feeling fresh. It affects all marathon runners differently, and is ultimately just an indication that a 26.2-mile race matters to us.

More eminent minds than mine have tackled this topic. And this is not my attempt to shine brighter lights than sport psychologists or professional athletes might do. This is just me jotting down my thoughts about what worries me, and what doesn’t, as race day approaches. Some of it may resonate, some of it may just sound daft. Take it all with a pinch of salt. And don’t go changing any of your habits in any great hurry based on my warblings: indeed, if you only take one thing away from this post, it should be that maranoia affects us all differently, and that we all need to develop our own techniques to deal with it. Here’s what I become acutely aware of over the final fortnight leading up to a marathon, and how I go about limiting its impact on my sanity.

Note: The Urban Dictionary defines ‘maranoia’ as “A state of temporary paranoia while under the influence of marijuana”. That’s not the maranoia we’re talking about here. Hope that’s OK.


DISTANCE
“How far out should I run my last long run?” and “Am I training hard enough?” are two of the most common questions runners exchange in the weeks building up to a marathon. The two most common answers to the former, assuming you are targeting a marathon for racing purposes rather than treating it as a training run or comfortably pacing someone, are probably: “three weeks” and “two weeks”. Whereas the most common answer to the latter is: “probably not”.
I believe in tapering, i.e. in reducing your weekly mileage ahead of a target marathon. Really, I do. Not that everyone would think so: but then it’s all relative, and my weekly mileage is generally around the eighty mark. With my A race (Rotterdam Marathon) on Sunday, I cut my mileage down to 67 miles this week. Which, I’m aware, represents a higher figure than many hit at any stage during their maratraining, let alone a week out. But then my body is used to high mileage, and I don’t want to give it too big a shock. My mind is equally accustomed to high mileage, and has been known to fret when I’ve tried to reduce it, as I did in early 2016. Result: my pace decreased. So I increased my mileage again and set PBs across all distances. I’m weird like that. Equally, my mind is worried that my body may get heavier… but more of that later.
The good thing about this particular taper is that I can look back at “what worked before”, i.e. to how I tapered ahead of my sub-3 last November. Y’all know I ran a sub-3 last November, right? November 13, 2016: Marathon des Alpes Maritimes, from Nice to Cannes. 2:59’38”. And I did so having run 70.7 miles between October 31 and November 6, in turn almost twenty miles fewer than the week prior. Not that I am treating these numbers, or their daily components, as binding: but it helps my confidence to know that they led to a PB. Which is not to say they weren’t too many, or indeed too few: so, even with that knowledge, experiments continue. Hence the slightly fewer miles this time round…




The above paragraph and image should answer how long I believe a taper should be. Two weeks works for me. The picture below, in which the red circle is my sub-3 marathon, should back that up. But if a 3-week taperschmaper works for you, run with three. I would freak out that I might put on a few pounds, but then I don’t worry unduly about injuries or heavy legs…
(Oh: and when I refer to it as ‘taperschmaper’ it’s with nothing but affection. Honest.)


PACE
Reduce distance, not intensity. Reduce distance, not intensity. Reduce distance, not intensity.

If I were to give three pieces of tapering advice, in Blairite fashion they’d be the three above. Which is not to say that I don’t treat myself to a few easier runs than usual in the final fortnight. But then, as a runstreaker, pushing myself to the limit every day makes no sense. So I do throw in some 10ks at around a minute over my target marathon pace (‘MP’). But equally I try to keep most of my training runs around MP+30”, and even to sneak in some shorter, faster runs. Which I find really hard, as I race far better than I train. The fact that races don’t begin at 6 o’clock and average 40ft/mi of elevation probably helps with that…
…in a nutshell: I like to approach races with the target pace a relatively close friend, not some stranger I’m encountering for the first time. But sure, we’ll have to try and hang around each other a bit longer on The Day, that’s all. That’s all. That’s…

(Presumably, followers of training plans don’t worry as much about pace and distance. Someone’s done the worrying, and the planning, for them. It won’t surprise you that I do a lot of planning: it’s just that, rather than follow strict plans to the letter, I create my own schedules based on my own experiences. Which isn’t to say they’re perfect: but I feel more comfortable this way than I would following a book. I just need to continually strike the balance between “feeling comfortable” and “slipping into a comfort zone”, as there is always room for change and improvement. After all, as runner we don’t stand still, do we?)


NIGGLES
What’s the difference between a runner with niggles and a runner without any?
One of them has a race coming up.

This is probably the area where having run ten of these blasted things before helps the most. Because I’ve not only run ten, I’ve prepared for ten. Indeed, I’ve prepared for eleven: but let’s not mention Manchester 2014, eh? Suffice to say that I didn’t complete it… Oh, and can we also gloss over the fact that 2013 and 2015, as well as 2012 (which I didn’t run), were later deemed to have fallen 380m short of the mythical 42,195km distance? I’m still counting them!

Right: back to niggles of the physical type…

A 10-mi run generally requires putting one foot in front of the other over a dozen thousand times. And each and every time we do that we’re putting pressure on our feet, our joints, our bones… we’re risking twisting our ankle, or falling…
…running is one of the most natural acts in which we could engage. Which is why it’s at its most dangerous when we switch out of automatic mode and think about it.

I have run on niggles, but have never run on an injury. Considering I’ve run every day for the past 1,635 days, that tells you how lucky my body has been over the past four years with injuries. And how comfortable my mind has become in dismissing niggles.
They’re just part of the running package. I’ve never told anyone till now, but I had a niggle for around four weeks ahead of Nice-Cannes. Somehow the plant of my left foot didn’t feel right, especially at the start of a run. This left me with a choice to make: go online and self-diagnose myself with plantar fasciitis before putting the running shoes away for a few weeks, or carry on running and see if it got any worse. I carried on running. It didn’t get any worse. I PB’d.
I’m in a similar situation now. There’s ‘something’ I’m aware of which I’d gladly make disappear with a magic wand, or even a magic sponge. But I can’t. It’s been there for over a week now, during which time I’ve set a new 5k PB and logged some gratifying training runs. Most importantly, it’s not got any worse. It’s ‘there’, but it’s not affecting my running. So why worry?
Besides, this is another example of how the more we run, the more we learn how our body works. The panel on our water filter’s lid no longer indicates when the cartridge needs changing. But then I never did pay much attention to it. What I did go by, and still can and do, is whether any calcium is left flowing at the bottom of the kettle. When that becomes the case, I change the cartridge. Equally, I don’t go by Strava e-mails nor manufacturers’ recommendations in deciding when to retire a pair of shoes. Upon becoming aware of this latest niggle, I knew exactly what the problem was: I needed to retire my second pair of Saucony Virratas. I’d felt a similar niggle just before retiring the first pair. Only now am I checking the mileage I got out of both pairs, confident that they will back up my argument. The ones destined for next week’s recycling have covered 870 miles. The ones I retired fifteen months ago, having bought both pairs at the same time (January 2015 sales!), had covered…
…831 miles. I’ve genuinely only now checked. And a 39-mile difference makes perfect sense considering I had tried to slip back into my first pair after that 95-mile ultra, when my legs probably needed a wee bit more support than now…


04/04/2017: Right, remember that definition of maranoia I highlighted at the beginning? Namely the one describing it as “the nervous state during pre-marathon taper that amplifies every sniffle into PB-dream ending pneumonia, and every twinge into a debilitating chronic injury”?
After a highly encouraging 15-mi run on Sunday, I was out on a comfortable 10k recovery run yesterday when my right calf suddenly felt ‘wrong’… in a way I’ve never experienced before I wasn't pushing, I wasn't running far, I was just ambling along on what should have been the most innocuous of runs…

…I soon stopped and stretched a little. Not knowing what else to do, I did what I usually do when I don’t know what to do: and ran. I was 2.3mi into the run at that stage: I could have done a lot worse than heading straight home, which would have probably made for a round 5k anyway. But I carried on. Sunday’s run had featured my first sub-90’ Half in training; yesterday was just about loosening up, running progressively faster miles but none in less than 8’10”. And the mile splits suggest I achieved that goal perfectly. However…

…the pain increased once I’d got home and stopped. The fact that it’s race week no doubt heightens awareness: but for most of yesterday heading up the stairs entailed turning the right foot outwards and taking the steps one at a time. Walking on the flat wasn’t pretty, either. Maranoia didn’t help, but the pain was real…
…out came the ice pack, and I asked Mike for advice. This resulted in a hot bath and a couple of texts to Karen pleading her to pick up some Ibuprofen gel. Mike backed the “cheap generic form from Tesco”; Karen picked up an even cheaper, equally generic form from Home Bargains. You know it’s cheap when she doesn’t ask for her money back…

…I headed this morning, with an open mind: anything between a mile and 3.1 miles (5k). Not least because I wanted to pay Tesco a visit, I ended up running 5k: and they were nowhere near as pretty as yesterday’s 10, although not as bad as I’d feared last night. I certainly didn’t hang around once I got home, heading straight for a hot bath. Another will follow later. Compression socks are on, courtesy of advice from Alex and others on Strava, where, after yesterday’s reluctance, I shared my woes. This also prompted Ciaran to drop me a line suggesting a stretching technique that’s worked for him: it doesn’t seem to be doing me any harm, so far…



…if how I go about heading up the stairs is my KPI, then things are improving. Time alone will tell whether they improve in time for Sunday’s race to remain a PB attempt. I will definitely travel, and I am 99% confident of running: should the 1% materialise, I’ll support Mike, Sarah, Philip and Steven from the sides with Judy and the two Lucys. But, with another marathon (London) coming up a fortnight later, deferring my PB attempt is an option. One I probably won’t exercise. But one which is helping alleviate maranoia, right now… as I try desperately to not aimlessly seek to alleviate frustration through snacking, especially given my maranoid weight gain concerns…

Fortunately, I’ve now raced enough to know that no training I put in this week is going to boost my form ahead of Sunday. It’s all about fine-tuning now. So, whilst I’d love to slip in a few miles around Sunday’s target pace, I’m not going to stress out if I don’t. I have to trust the training to date: and I’m happy to do so, because it’s been good training. If I get to Sunday’s start line with no grand pains, I can still give my goal a shot. If.

Right: that’s it as far as today’s addition goes. The rest was all written before I was struck down by maranoia. Or a trapped nerve. Or a tight muscle. Or whatever it is. Given my right knee had been hurting for a few weeks, maybe the pain’s just trickling down my leg, with a view to leaving for good once it’s ensured I keep the miles down this week…


SNEEZUMS
Offices don’t suddenly fill up with sneezing colleagues in the build-up to a race. It just seems that way.
Fortunately, I work from home, so I don’t worry about germs floating all over the pace. Not until The Boys come home from school, that is…
…I did worry two weeks before my first marathon, mind. We went out for Mother’s Day and my brother-in-law brought his stomach bug along. I survived, but it did play on my mind. By that stage of proceedings you’ve done the bulk of the hard work, and you know it – just like you know the recovery window opens as wide as a roof window, and can be just as hard to reach. There is little you can do but believe in your immune system, or in the nature of someone’s stomach bug being such that it won’t easily transfer. But there’s no denying these are two weeks when working from home is more appealing than ever, even if last week I did run 13.1mi into my office with an 8kg backpack. Can’t see that happening over the next few days…


NUTRITION
Another staple favourite of runners’ conversations…
I’ve got some cracking books on running nutrition. “Training Food”, “Performance Nutrition For Runners” and “Go Faster Food” all contain some awesome recipes. My favourite?
Hmmm… let me cook one of them and I’ll let you know.
I’m genuinely sure I’d love most of the dishes featured. But here’s the snag: I can’t cook. My wife can, but is fairly traditional, not least as we both have to balance our culinary preferences with raising two young boys. Their preferences go a long way in shaping our weekly meal plan: and, considering that when I return to Italy I always give advance notice to my 101-year old Nonna as to what I’d like her to cook, I can hardly grumble. And it helps that we eat fairly well anyway: pasta, rice, chicken, pizza, fishcakes… a runner could be far worse off. Although, after last weekend’s fishandchipsandmushypeas, I can’t wait for the next time I treat myself to them, post-Rotterdam…
Where carbloading is concerned, I again look to take a balanced view. Ahead of an Ultra, I’d start on the quinoa three or four days before the event. But, ahead of a marathon, I try to steer relatively clear of carbs during the first half of the week, to deplete (or at least reduce) my glycogen stores and not feel too bloated, before going a little more carb-heavy for three nights ahead of the race. Which doesn’t mean stuffing my face, rather increasing the percentage of carbs within my usual calorie intake. Not that it ever seems to fall below 60%, taperschmaper or not: it’s pretty much the rule. It reflects what we like in this house. In the thirty-six hours ahead of a marathon I’m just a bit more aware, and may give whole-wheat pasta precedence over the usual stuff, or indulge in a Clif Bar just ‘because’. To some extent, this has become part of my routine, which generally entails a lengthy journey by air or rail for which I like to ensure I have my own food and am not at the mercy of what’s around me and when. It’s a routine I’ve come to enjoy: the race may take three hours (or so), but its appeal owes a lot to the build-up and the aftermath. That’s why, and how, over the past four years I’ve come to forge my own little rituals, from stuffing bagels, packing cereal bars and scheduling when I should eat them to planning the race-day breakfast I’ll eat in my hotel room. It’s not just about the science… it’s about the peace of mind, too!
And still, for all my habits I’m far more relaxed now. I began taking my own food with me after Chester 2014, when, on the Saturday Mike, Sarah, Alex, Dani and I struggled to find a table to eat as early as we’d have liked. But a week on Saturday I’ll be sat in Spaghettata in Rotterdam with Mike, Sarah, Phil, Judith, Lucy, Steven and Lucy. The key difference? This time we’ve booked.
Carbloading isn’t the answer to all distance running challenges it is something portrayed to be. Failing to carbload isn’t synonymous to failure. Just be sensible, and don’t panic. As much as anything, eat something you know you’ll digest easily. Which, fortunately, ties in nicely with eating carbs.


WEIGHT
This is where maranoia still gets me…

As per the section above, I don’t get hung up about what I eat. But, as you may have gleaned from the stats I just quoted, I do calorie-count, and not just during taperschmaper time, to keep my weight in check. The mere act of having to log something helps me avoid snacking more than I already do, a genuine problem for the homeworker whose hand somehow seems to always end up in a cereal box whilst the kettle’s boiling…
In the week building up to Nice-Cannes, I spent Monday to Friday in Warsaw on business. Prior to flying out, I was terrified I’d find myself putting on weight as a result of eating out four nights in a row and indulging in work lunches. Truth is, I was able to eat delicious food but not to excess, as dining out does away with the temptation of second helpings, if not thirds… and the broad-ranging menus meant I could take in more proteins during the first few nights than had I been home in sunny Portishead.

According to the likes of Running For Fitness, my marathon time should go up or down by 2’10” for every kilo more or less I take to the start line. Roughly speaking, that’s around 5”/mi. That may not sound a lot to the uninitiated, but sounds like a lifetime to members of the Marathon Runners’ Club…
130”/kg. That’s heavy stuff. Do I believe it? Am I going to spend the next week desperately trying to shed as much weight as possible?

No. I do want to shed a pound or so, yes: and that sounds a bigger challenge when decreasing mileage, which is one reason I just can’t help myself from running seventy miles a week ahead of a marathon. However, in my own personal experience I’ve pulled it off, mainly because Strava overestimates my calorie consumption and therefore I am more likely to shed a little weight when both estimated calorie burn and intake are lower than usual. But I still need to live…

Some people worry about how I go about logging weight. That I’m obsessed. Which I am, yes: but with data and stats, not with weight (and fat percentage, water percentage and BMI day) itself. Yes, as raceday approaches I weigh myself more than the usual once a week: but that doesn’t alter the fact that weight has become a secondary stat for me. It was the primary one when I took to running: had I not weighed nigh on a hundred kilos when I was operated on in November 2011, I may never have laced up five months later. Today, however, all stats bow to running indicators. Am I a bit heavier than twelve months ago? Yes. Am I a bit faster? Yes. And guess which bit matters most to me? But I still like keeping an eye on the numbers, if only to keep the other eye out for correlations between how much and how well I’m running and what the scales say.

Moreover, Running For Fitness’ own Owen Barder, who’s behind the excellent site, lays out the perfect disclaimer:
“The calculation assumes that everything else is held constant – so that the body’s capacity to turn oxygen into energy is otherwise unaffected. This means that VO2 max would change in direct proportion to the percentage change in weight. The predicted performances are derived by simply calculating the predicted race performance at the new VO2 max.
In real life, however, everything else would not be constant. A reduction in weight might be accompanied by:
  • a higher background level of training;
  • lower muscle mass;
  • reduced immunity;
  • reduced glycogen stores;
  • lower levels of hydration
All but the first of these would be expected to lead to a deterioration in athletic performance. These changes would have to be offset against the direct benefits of the weight loss.”

Couldn’t have put it better myself. But still… 2’10”/kg…



SLEEP
Tip: get some.
Ahead of my first marathon, I read somewhere that you should look to get a good night’s sleep two nights ahead of the race, as the chances of you sleeping well on race eve were slim. As simple pieces of advice go, one of the best. And all the truer for me, as two nights before a race I’m generally in my own bed, whereas on race eve it’s usually a Premier Inn. The mattresses and pillows live up to their “Good Night Guarantee”, but some of their walls have proven thinner than ideal – especially with a 5am alarm set..!
Fortunately, I don’t lose sleep over the risk of losing sleep. I’ve generally always been good at dozing off; and I may even have improved in recent weeks, since reintroducing an old friend to my cocktail of drugs. Anti-epileptic drugs, that is. My consultant advised me to take Phenobarbital just before I go to bed, and I can certainly see why. Whether I feel slightly less springy the following morning is down to the med or to the general state of things, or indeed whether I feel thus because I was warned I might, I don’t know. But I have set 5k, HM and 20mi PBs since starting to take it again just over a month ago, so it can’t be doing any harm…



COURSE DISTANCE
C’mon, let’s not deny this…
As I mentioned earlier, the first two Greater Manchester Marathons I completed were belatedly called short. By the time that news broke I’d set a new PB, at the 26.2mi 2016 event: but, for many runners, it meant the history books were being rewritten. Times were changed. Some who’d sprinted below the magical three-hour mark found their revised times to still begin with a 2, but felt cheated and robbed nonetheless. And thousands for whom this was probably going to be the one and only marathon were left wondering if they’d truly joined the Marathon Runners’ Club.
I went to tweak my Manchester 2016 PB in Nice some eight months later. I was fortunate to stop the clock a full 22” before the hour counter changed to 3, and probably around two minutes before suffering an epileptic seizure. My GPS watch, however, recorded the distance as 26.4 miles, as did those of most other runners whose activities I subsequently glanced at for this very purpose. 26.2 is the shortest possible distance in which you can cover the course, and bends and fellow competitors mean you will generally run a little further. But what if that ‘little’ turns out to be enough to deny you your goal? After all, only last week news broke that last year’s Brighton Half Marathon was 146m short… two months after Edinburgh HM was discovered to have been 149.7m short… how hard it is to measure a course? Please, please, please get it right!
(Not too worried this time. We’ll be in the Netherlands. In the city of Phillips, for that matter. They won’t let us down. Or short.)


LOGISTICS AND KIT
As epilepsy prevents me from driving, I rely on trains and planes to get me to my key races. They’ve yet to fail me yet: but then I do build plenty of cushion time into my plans to allow for delays…
Linked to this is the fact that I can’t just fill up my car boot with running gear. I have to pack selectively yet comprehensively, generally allowing for multiple weather scenarios. As with most things, this is an area where experience helps: hence none of my bags have matched the size and weight of the one I packed for my first marathon, duly labelled in that four-year old post as “The World’s Heaviest Bag Ever (‘TWHBE’)”.
It’s worth highlighting that one reason for my decreased packing maranoia is that, amongst the many things races have taught me, one is that the running community will always take care of its own. I now travel knowing that, if I have forgotten something, another runner will be able to help me out. As did Mike with ShotBloks in Chester… but the same would hold true about kit, I’m sure. Much as it’s a theory I don’t wish to test, that’s not due to lack of confidence in it.
Of course, the critical piece of kit, the one you might be able to borrow but really wouldn’t want to, are your shoes. Which are often the last thing I pack, purely to reduce the impact of their smell on everything else! Now, there was no travel packing required for last month’s Bath Half Marathon: indeed, had there been I might have raced in the shoes I’d planned on wearing. But I only realised I’d put on a different pair when Jonathan, my traveling companion for the day, pointed out I’d not tied my timing chip to them. And even then it took me a short while to realise it wasn’t a case of the chip having slipped off, rather of the shoes on which I’d placed it not having been slipped on…
…a few stressful minutes ensued, but I ultimately managed to get a different number and, later in the morning, a PB (1:25’58”). I’d long been pondering between the shoes I left behind (Saucony Fastwitch) and those I grabbed (Saucony Kinvara 7): the former felt nippier, the latter comfier. A nippy run in the tighter Fastwitch two weeks before the race had left me with a blister that, whilst not life-threatening, I wasn’t keen to test unduly. So grabbing the Kinvaras was probably a blessing in disguise, even if it did cost me £15 in the shape of a new number. I’ll let you guess which pair is coming to the Netherlands with me. Well, which pair I plan on taking, anyway.
(The design of the Kinvaras is such that you would be forgiven they’d suffered a rip near the tongue. Especially when maranoia’s about. Not that I thought that when I put them on for Sunday’s run. No sirree. Not me.)


WEATHER
Last but definitely not least…
This is a tough one. When an extra second matters, so does an extra rain drop or gust of wind. Not that we can influence the weather any more than we can assess the course length. But that doesn’t stop us from constantly refreshing our apps, hoping it’ll show a few white fluffy clouds!
Adverse weather conditions, by which I don’t mean a tad of wind and a couple of drops, can render months of training fruitless. It’s a sobering thought. I’m generally good at not worrying too much about what I cannot control, but I’ll own up to being an addicted weather app refresher. So much so that I can tell you that the current forecast for Rotterdam on April 9th indicates a sunny day, with highs of 15 and a 9mph Easterly-South Easterly breeze. I’d gladly swap that for the forecast for twenty-hours prior, with a few more white fluffy things hanging around, a high of 14 and a 7mph wind. Equally, I’ve long stopped believing in weather forecasts…
…I don’t know if this is climate change-related or not, but their reliability has been declining, least in my neck of the woods. So I should be pretty successful in holding off the app for a good few days. After that, I can but hope it’ll be dry and not too windy. All the better if it’s not too hot, but growing up in Italy may rescue me, as will the numerous water stations. 

. . .

There you have it: what I worry about, what I don’t waste mental energy on. Weather excepted, I generally worry about what I can impact, and don’t let what I can’t impact worry me. And there’s nowt wrong with worrying about something you can do something about, as long as you do something about it. Which is why I’ll be showing restraint when we sit down for lasagne later.

Hope that was worth your time. It was fairly easy to write, with ten marathon finisher’s medals by my side. Fewer than many, but more than many more… and the preparation for each and every one of them has taught me something, whether because successful or a failure.

I can vividly recall the build-up to my first, four years ago, when I was hanging on to every magazine article and every piece of advice on social media, which is easier said than done, when you routinely come across conflicting advice. But that just goes to show how we learn what really works not by reading, but by running. By preparing for races, by planning our strategy, by how successful we are with executing it or adapting it. It’s not that there isn’t a manual: there are thousands. We just have to pick up nuggets here and there and write our own. Then refine it until we’re truly comfortable with it. All along, of course, whilst continuing to seek out elements that we can improve, or that need tweaking because of specific circumstances about the race or the shape in which we find ourselves approaching it.

No matter how much we discover about ourselves through running, we can always discover more. And tapering’s no exception. So, if you are preparing for a marathon, no matter how far out, good luck with the training leading up to it, with the taper itself, and with the race that is the culmination of it all. I know which of the three I find hardest.


Right – I’m off to stretch… again! Then it’ll be almost time for more Ibuprofen… and I’ll make sure I manage another hot bath tonight! And I'll go OTT with the Radox, having restocked this morning. I badly felt I needed to score another bottle yesterday. I've never smoked nor drunk to excess, but I did feel like an addict close to running out of his drug of choice...

Thursday, 14 April 2016

Have you heard about Little Stoke parkrun?


 I don’t know if you’ve heard, but…


…’my’ parkrun is being shut down by the local council.

Many a column inch and screen pixel have been devoted to Stoke Gifford Parish Council’s decision to close down Little Stoke parkrun. Well, technically they’ve not “closed it down”: but, by requiring that runners pay for use of the park, they all but have, as it goes against parkrun’s ethos and strategy. parkruns are free, timed 5k runs that take place across the UK (and beyond) at 9:00 every Saturday morning. There are almost four-hundred events: Stoke Gifford Parish Council have been trailblazers by being the first to take this step.

Technically, Little Stoke parkrun isn’t my local parkrun, either. I’m one of the outsiders whose council tax ends up in different coffers: in my case North Somerset’s, so the good people of Stoke Gifford Parish Council would presumably rather I wore out the Ashton Court tarmac, alongside around four-hundred others who run Ashton Court parkrun. And on four occasions I have: it’s an unusual course, where you spend the first half struggling uphill before turning round and bombing it downhill. Given I spend the rest of the week going up and down hills in Portishead, cometh parkrunday I prefer an easier, flatter course to check where I’m at with my speed and look to improve it: and three (almost four) laps of Little Stoke offer just that. Which is why my Little Stoke PB is 18’36” and my Ashton Court PB is 19’57”. More importantly, over the course of 54 Little Stoke parkruns I have made many new friends, shared many tales of running and life, continuing those conversations during the week over social media... proof that parkrun is a key component of the modern form of running in this part-physical, part-digital world we inhabit.

This post isn’t about the rights and wrongs of the council’s decision: by now you’ve probably heard all the facts and don’t need me to cover them again. If you haven’t, you can find them here - and make up your own mind:

The letter from Stoke Gifford Parish Council to local residents (23/03/2016):

The Little Stoke parkrun team’s responses (30/03/2016):

Little Stoke parkrun and parkrun HQ’s responses to the Parish Council’s decision (12/04/2016):

Little Stoke parkrun’s statement as to why it’s cancelling the April 16 event (the council has left the negotiation window open until May 28, so events could continue until then):

These statements highlight the dignity and constructive approach displayed throughout the process by all associated with parkrun. In combination with the media coverage, they also highlight that, in spite of having commented on the fact that only a minority of the thousands of signatories to the petition to keep Little Stoke parkrun open were local residents, Stoke Gifford Parish Council failed to prepare a PR strategy and draft adequate, factual answers to the questions that have followed. Granted, they don’t have the expertise of the central parkrun machine: but they have displayed a naivety surprising even for a local council. They’ve not even calculated an initial estimate of how much they believe parkrun should contribute, which you’d think would be a fairly key element in any negotiation. Not that any such negotiations can take place, for the benefit of the broader parkrun community: if we pay at Little Stoke, many fellow parkrunners will soon find themselves in a similar situation. Still: if you’re going to ask for money, come up with a figure, eh?

But, as I said, it’s not the specific of this instance that have drawn me to the keyboard on this occasion. The facts are out there: make up your own mind. What I wanted to address is a question that has been asked by the Council as well as by many others: why should a running event be free, when local football, rugby etc. clubs foot a bill?

My answer is two-fold. The first half is short and is one you’ll have heard already:

Little Stoke parkrunners run around a public section of the park and use public toilets. This requires no additional expense, such as the maintenance of a field or of astroturf pitches. Make what you will of the council’s comments about the wear of the tarmac: personally, I’m not sure we do any damage. And would I expect my council to levy a charge on Stoke Gifford residents for walking up and down the Portishead seafront on a sunny day? No. There is freedom of movement across the EU and that applies to the South Gloucestershire / Bristol / North Somerset borders, too.

As for the second bit…

I’m going to address purely because I’ve not come across this perspective on any of the other posts and articles I’ve read. No point weighing in by simply reiterating what’s already been said. This came to me during a run this morning, as many thoughts do: a run through woods and rocks along the estuary edge. Hopefully this particular thought makes more sense than others…

. . .

You’ll have heard many runners wax lyrical about the health benefits of running. Over the past few months, you may also have come across news coverage about the “unrelenting march” of obesity and diabetes. Which makes running’s benefits all the more precious. But don’t believe us. Here’s what Dame Sally Davies, Chief Medical Officer for England, had to say:

“As Chief Medical Officer I endorse parkrun as a valuable and innovative vehicle for promoting physical activity. It is fun, engaging, and provides an environment to meet people and benefit your health. I regularly tell my friends and colleagues about parkrun, and so should all of you – we must spread the word!”

(Indeed, she a lot more to say. You can read all the praise she heaps on parkrun here.)

But some will still say: “OK, I get it: running is good for your health. But what I still don’t get is – how’s that different from, say, football, cricket or tennis? Why should runners not pay when clubs do?”

A reasonable question. Hopefully, you’ll find this to be a reasonable answer.

I mentioned football, cricket and tennis, but could have chosen any sports. I chose the three I played the most in my pre-children days. I was a keen but bad footballer, least until I donned the gloves, with which I enjoyed moderate success. I was a keen but atrocious cricketer, in spite of a knock of 53 for Portishead III and figures of 4-19 for Portishead IV: growing up in Italy and not joining a cricket club till the age of 34 not helpful factors, I trust you’ll agree. And I was a keen and good tennis player, Portishead Lawn Tennis Club’s 2008 Men’s Singles Champion and 2008 and 2009 Mens’ Doubles Champion. Only ever runner-up in the Mixed, sadly. A topic that may resurface when I meet up with my old Mixed partner in a couple of days’ time, unless I can focus on talking running and she can focus on her current tennis success…

Now, why do I refer to my “pre-children days”?

Because parenthood changes us forever. It changes what we prioritise, how much time we have on our hands, how we spend our money… Marriage starts the process, but it’s kids who drive it to completion.

So, during the first few years of this millennium I’d play tennis three times a week, four during League season. Following a series of only loosely connected events I moved to Portishead during the dying days of 1999, not knowing anyone here: and it was sport that changed that. With my epileptic brain behaving, I was able to drive until 2002: after that, once I’d suffered my first seizure in a decade and more followed, I had to rely on lifts to and fro the tennis club. Where my abilities were exaggerated by a relatively low standard, truth be told. The homemade cakes on Saturday afternoon were phenomenal: the quality of the play less so. I was a good player, but not that good. And I could cover the ground faster than most, without actually being that fit. It’s all relative, is fitness…

…Big’Un was born in May 2007, Littl’Un followed in June 2009. By that stage I wasn’t driving anymore: and young kids make it hard to commit to being at a certain place for a lift, to be home by a certain time… because fixed schedules go out of the window. So I played less and less, caught in a vicious circle of declining fitness, form, likelihood of winning, enjoyment… I stayed home more and more, caught in an equally vicious circle of doing little, finishing the food on my kids’ plates (once they’d grown teeth), putting on weight…

Almost exactly four years ago, on April 18, 2012, I laced up for the first time. Back then I hated running with a passion, hence my blog being called “I Can’t Stand Running”. However, because I needed something I could do when it suited, where it suited and for however long it suited, I gave running a go. Suited me, my work life and, critically, my young family. I would have gone back to cycling, but for two seizures whilst on my bike meaning my wife had duly and rightly banned me. So, six months after undergoing brain surgery (I weighed in at a whisker under 100kg for the anaesthetic), options were limited… and out I went. I ran a minute, then walked a minute, and did that a total ten times. Because, with running, no matter what shape you’re in, you’re in good enough shape to start.

I didn’t run my first parkrun until December 21, 2013. I’d run two marathons and an Ultra by then! I’d not intentionally avoided parkrun: on the contrary, I’d heard great things about it, its community and the training value of 5ks for long-distance runners, and I would have loved to have broken my duck months before. But Big’Un (Roberto) had swimming lessons on Saturday mornings, so I had to stay home with Littl’Un (Daniel). The freedom of running meant I could get in my own 5k before Karen and he set off, but the responsibilities of parenthood meant I couldn’t join the community. Not till Roberto stopped taking swimming lessons, anyway – without much to show for them, either…

But that was me. And I don’t mind running alone. I love running with others and experience that “sense of community” repeatedly referenced this week. But I will go out and run 40 miles on my own, too, the way that at the start of my running days I’d go and run/walk (a minute of each, ten times). Not everybody will. Many need that sense of community, to be part of something bigger than just going out and running on your own. And that community is all-embracing: it doesn’t matter how good you are. All that matters is that you want to get better.

And that, friends and councillors, is why running is different.

When I was 36 and looking to improve my fitness, I couldn’t have turned up at the local football club. Where, if you’re not good enough, you don’t play: you’d just be a liability for your team-mates, taking the place of more deserving players. It doesn’t happen.

Nor could I have gone to my old cricket club. I might have scraped into a Sunday friendly team, who knows. But I wouldn’t have got in any real exercise: I’d have just stood virtually still in the field and hung around very little in the middle. Factor in the post-match drinks and, fitness-wise, I’d have been worse off.

Tennis? Maybe. At least it can be a solo effort. But it would have taken me weeks to find my touch again, and months to lose some weight – probably nowhere near as much as I needed to. Weeks and months during which I’d have been unable to win as many matches as I used to. Would I have stuck with this new state of things? Probably not. Besides, the nature of Portishead L.T.C. and number of available courts meant I only really got the chance to play doubles there. Good for fitness, but not great.

But running…

…running respects those looking to make a change in their lives. It lets them do as much or as little as they want or can. parkrunners, in particular, are boundlessly supportive of fellow runners’ efforts. Running can be mean (ask anyone twenty miles into a marathon), but running is always fair (ask anyone sixpointtwo miles later).

. . .

Time is precious. Time spent running is an investment. Just like buying kit is a financial investment, although you can give it a go on old trainers, shorts and (whisper it quietly) a cotton t-shirt. As with any investment, we make it because we expect a return. And running delivers return on investment (‘ROI’) faster than most sports: it’s the nature of cardio exercise. In doing so, it engenders a virtuous circle: you run, you lose weight, you run faster, you feel better about running…
…you run more, you feel better…
…and, in the process, you pay more attention to nutrition, so as to not undo your own good work. Before you know it, you’re hooked on endorphins rather than crisps: and things only get better from there!

That’s why running is different from other sports. That is why councils have a moral obligation towards their residents to enable running: because, with every mile and every smile, they are taking preventive care of themselves and reducing the risk of becoming a burden on overstretched resources. People are living longer: the strain on healthcare resources is greater than ever, with a smaller percentage of the population working to pay for them. I doubt parkruns are truly damaging the Little Stoke park tarmac: I do believe that many of those runners won’t lace up and go running on their own, thus becoming more likely to become burdens on our healthcare system. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow: but running, or lack of, is a long-term thing.

And that, Stoke Gifford Parish Council, is why I believe you are being bad stewards of your funds. There are no winners and losers at parkrun. There aren’t those not good enough to get picked who have to watch from the sidelines, maybe kids who are then mocked at school and potentially put off sport for a long time. Nobody spends half the afternoon running from fine leg to fine leg only to come into bat at eight, face one ball and head back to the pavilion. I say this with nothing but love for football and cricket: I view instilling a love for participating in sports as one of my responsibilities as a parent, because I view sports as a great teacher, in victory and even more so in defeat. But I won’t push my children into anything, lest it backfires: they’ve tried a few, they’ll try some more, hopefully they’ll find one they love so that they can engage with its challenges as well as team-mates and opponents.

Here’s hoping we’ll still be parkrunning in Little Stoke park come June. I once ran Little Stoke parkrun with my children and I once ran it with my Dad. You can take my parkrun away from me, Stoke Gifford Parish Council: but those are memories even you can’t touch. And, given my kids were six and four (I think… the pain of running with Littl’Un on my shoulders has somewhat blurred the memory!) when I ran with them, and Dad was 70 when I ran with him…
…there aren’t many sports that would have enabled that.

If not in Little Stoke, I’ll be parkrunning elsewhere. Or running up and down some other road. Stoke Gifford Parish Council is not putting my fitness at risk, much as I do hope to keep running there because my marathon running has benefitted immensely from doing so (after last week’s post, 3:01’31”, in case you’re wondering). But it is jeopardising some of its own residents’ fitness, both those who won’t carry on running and those who, worse still, will never start. How many of the “Couch to 5k” (an official NHS program) runners whose crowning 5k run has been Little Stoke parkrun may not embark on that journey – if only because its absence means nobody organises a local one in the first place?

I don’t know. Nobody knows. But let’s not have to find out.

Oh, and obviously (but just in case)…
…when talking about running’s right to be free I’m talking about initiatives like parkrun, where nobody makes a profit and disruption is minimal. Because we don’t monopolise the park, nor do we require road closures or medical staff as is the case with commercial events. I love parkrun, but that’s not to say I don’t expect to pay for any race. Although I do wish I could manage some Social Ultra runs: they’re a bit like parkrun, just with more scope to eat.

. . .


On a final note, my heartfelt congratulations and thanks to the entire Little Stoke parkrun team for the dignity they’ve shown during this process, throughout which they have sought to be nothing but constructive. And to all the volunteers whose time is worth so, so much more than tarmac. Here’s hoping their steadfast refusal to mount an adversarial campaign will prove successful in the end.

Happy running, everyone! Oh, and councillors… one last thing…

…have you looked into seeing if anyone fancies paying for a concession to sell us hot drinks and snacks after our weekly parkrun? It’s a smart way of paying for at least some of the tarmac: works at Pomphrey, Burnham… the football club (who presumably pay for use of the facilities) makes a few quid out of it at Chipping Sodbury… Ashton Court has its cafĂ©, obviously… Indeed, at all other local parkruns somebody’s selling something!


And everybody’s winning. Not just every single runner. Because it’s not just about parkrunning. It never is.


(Still unsure? Then watch this: http://loveparkrun.com.)